Hi Simon, On Wednesday 29 August 2012 15:07:49 Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:35:46PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Monday 27 August 2012 17:54:52 Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:00:35PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > As part of a general panel API implementation (more on that a bit > > > > later), I've cleaned up panel support in the LCDC driver and in the > > > > related board code. The result is 19 patches independent of the > > > > generic panel API that I would like to get reviewed by the respective > > > > board maintainers. > > > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > I'm happy for you to take all of this, including the mach-shmobile > > > portions through your tree if that works for you. > > > > I usually push the LCDC patches through the fbdev tree. I'm fine with both > > options though. > > I'm happy for you to handle things in your normal way. > > I guess that means that once the LCDC changes are in the fbdev tree > Paul should take the linux-sh changes and I should take the shmobile > changes, is that correct? To avoid bisection breakages all the patches should go through the same tree. This will of course increase the chances of merge conflicts. Would you rather take them all through linux-sh ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
