Hi, On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 02:42 +0200, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: > If the size of memory region that is being set up is the same as before, > we don't have to do memory and layer busy checks. > > Signed-off-by: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > I'm not sure if this is semantically correct, but this helps to get > some old programs working, that rely on old DSS version which didn't > check for mmap lock, but incidentally they are using same size too.. Well, I wouldn't allow code like that if it was a new ioctl, but if, as you say, the old omapfb worked that way, then I think it's better to do things the same way. I can see no harm in it, so I'll apply. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
