Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote:
>> @@ -348,6 +341,11 @@ struct fsl_diu_data {
>> enum fsl_diu_monitor_port monitor_port;
>> struct diu __iomem *diu_reg;
>> spinlock_t reg_lock;
>> + unsigned int mode; /* DIU operation mode */
>
> And here you are introducing mode again....
I have no idea how that happened. I never touched patch #9 during my
rebase, and I removed that line from patch #8, so I can't explain how it
got added back.
I spent hours verifying the patches to make sure that git-bisect still
works and that each patch is clean. It just never occurred to me to
double-check a commit that I didn't modify.
> I think that you did not want to do
> this, so I only took the v2 of this series and combined them with the other
> patches of your old series (with the addition to the commit message in 4/9 as
> you wanted). Please verify that the result in
> git://github.com/schandinat/linux-2.6.git fbdev-next
> is what you want to have there.
Yes, it looks good. Thanks for taking care of this for me. These are the
last patches for 3.2.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
