Re: Idea of a v4l -> fb interface driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 27 May 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:

> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote:

...

> > Ok, let me explain what exactly I meant. Above I referred to "display
> > drivers," which is not the same as a "framebuffer controller driver" or
> > whatever you would call it. By framebuffer controller driver I mean a
> > driver for the actual graphics engine on a certain graphics card or an
> > SoC. This is the part, that reads data from the actual framebuffer and
> > outputs it to some hardware interface to a display device. Now this
> > interface can be a VGA or a DVI connector, it can be one of several bus
> > types, used with various LCD displays. In many cases this is all you have
> > to do to get the output to your display. But in some cases the actual
> > display on the other side of this bus also requires a driver. That can be
> > some kind of a smart display, it can be a panel with an attached display
> > controller, that must be at least configured, say, over SPI, it can be a
> > display, attached to the host over the MIPI DSI bus, and implementing some
> > proprietary commands. In each of these cases you will have to write a
> > display driver for this specific display or controller type, and your
> > framebuffer driver will have to interface with that display driver. Now,
> > obviously, those displays can be connected to a variety of host systems,
> > in which case you will want to reuse that display driver. This means,
> > there has to be a standard fb-driver - display-driver API. AFAICS, this is
> > currently not implemented in fbdev, please, correct me if I am wrong.
> 
> 
> Another API to consider in the drm kms (kernel modesetting) interface.
>  The kms API deals properly with advanced display hardware and
> properly handles crtcs, encoders, and connectors.  It also provides
> fbdev api emulation.

Well, is KMS planned as a replacement for both fbdev and user-space 
graphics drivers? I mean, if you'd be writing a new fb driver for a 
relatively simple embedded SoC, would KMS apriori be a preferred API?

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Tourism]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux