[One I never answered]
On Sat, 01 May 2010 16:01:30 +0200
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I fear this check is wrong as
>
> struct viafb_par {
> ...
> unsigned int memsize;
> ...
> }
>
> so this check would as far as I see never return true *wonders why gcc
> doesn't complain about it*
That is wrong, yes. As it happens, this gets fixed later in the series
when things move into via-core.c. I'd like to say that it's because I
noticed the problem and dealt with it, but you're smarter than that,
alas...
Thanks,
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
