The code below seems suspicious. Which definition of vblank_end is
the right one?
This is not intended as a proper patch. I can send a proper patch when I
know what to do.
julia
diff -u -p a/drivers/video/intelfb/intelfbhw.c b/drivers/video/intelfb/intelfbhw.c
--- a/drivers/video/intelfb/intelfbhw.c
+++ b/drivers/video/intelfb/intelfbhw.c
@@ -1192,7 +1192,6 @@ int intelfbhw_mode_to_hw(struct intelfb_
vsync_end = vsync_start + var->vsync_len;
vtotal = vsync_end + var->upper_margin;
vblank_start = vactive;
- vblank_end = vtotal;
vblank_end = vsync_end + 1;
DBG_MSG("V: act %d, ss %d, se %d, tot %d bs %d, be %d\n",
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
