Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think this should just be removed unconditionally, since the VFS now > takes care of mode masking in vfs_prepare_mode(). That works for symlinks because the symlink path doesn't call it? David
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think this should just be removed unconditionally, since the VFS now > takes care of mode masking in vfs_prepare_mode(). That works for symlinks because the symlink path doesn't call it? David