Re: [PATCH -next RFC 00/14] block: don't access bd_inode directly from other modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

在 2023/12/06 13:54, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 08:37:14PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Patch 1 add some bdev apis, then follow up patches will use these apis
to avoid access bd_inode directly, and hopefully the field bd_inode can
be removed eventually(after figure out a way for fs/buffer.c).

What tree is this against?  It fails to apply to either Jens'
for-6.8/block or Linus tree in the very first patch.

It was against linux-next branch, for the tag next-20231201, because I'm
not sure yet if this patchset should be applied to Jans' tree. Please
let me know if I should swith wo Jens' tree for v2.

Thanks,
Kuai

.






[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux