On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 08:37:14PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Patch 1 add some bdev apis, then follow up patches will use these apis > to avoid access bd_inode directly, and hopefully the field bd_inode can > be removed eventually(after figure out a way for fs/buffer.c). What tree is this against? It fails to apply to either Jens' for-6.8/block or Linus tree in the very first patch.
