Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 01:07:54 -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: >> This is v6 of the negative dentry on case-insensitive directories. >> Thanks Eric for the review of the last iteration. This version >> drops the patch to expose the helper to check casefolding directories, >> since it is not necessary in ecryptfs and it might be going away. It >> also addresses some documentation details, fix a build bot error and >> simplifies the commit messages. See the changelog in each patch for >> more details. >> >> [...] > > Ok, let's put it into -next so it sees some testing. > So it's too late for v6.7. Seems we forgot about this series. > Sorry about that. Christian, We are approaching -rc2 and, until last Friday, it didn't shown up in linux-next. So, to avoid turning a 6 month delay into 9 months, I pushed your signed tag to linux-next myself. That obviously uncovered a merge conflict: in v6.6, ceph added fscrypt, and the caller had to be updated. I fixed it and pushed again to linux-next to get more testing. Now, I don't want to send it to Linus myself. This is 100% VFS/FS code, I'm not the maintainer and it will definitely raise eyebrows. Can you please requeue and make sure it goes through this time? I'm happy to drop my branch from linux-next once yours shows up. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krisman/unicode.git/log/?h=negative-dentries This branch has the latest version with the ceph conflict folded in. I did it this way because I'd consider it was never picked up and there is no point in making the history complex by adding a fix on top of your signed tag, since it already fails to build ceph. I can send it as a v7; but I prefer you just pull from the branch above. Or you can ack and I'll send to Linus. This is the diff from you signed tag: diff --git a/fs/ceph/dir.c b/fs/ceph/dir.c index 629d8fb31d8f..21278a9d9baa 100644 --- a/fs/ceph/dir.c +++ b/fs/ceph/dir.c @@ -1869,7 +1869,7 @@ static int ceph_d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, const struct qstr *name, struct inode *dir, *inode; struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc; - valid = fscrypt_d_revalidate(dentry, flags); + valid = fscrypt_d_revalidate(dentry, name, flags); if (valid <= 0) return valid; diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c b/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c index 56093648d838..ce86891a1711 100644 --- a/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ /** * ecryptfs_d_revalidate - revalidate an ecryptfs dentry * @dentry: The ecryptfs dentry + * @name: The name under lookup * @flags: lookup flags * * Called when the VFS needs to revalidate a dentry. This diff --git a/fs/gfs2/dentry.c b/fs/gfs2/dentry.c index 3dd93d36aaf2..5e4910e016a8 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/dentry.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/dentry.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ /** * gfs2_drevalidate - Check directory lookup consistency * @dentry: the mapping to check + * @name: The name under lookup * @flags: lookup flags * * Check to make sure the lookup necessary to arrive at this inode from its -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi