[PATCH v5 02/10] ecryptfs: Reject casefold directory inodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Even though it seems to be able to resolve some names of
case-insensitive directories, the lack of d_hash and d_compare means we
end up with a broken state in the d_cache.  Considering it was never a
goal to support these two together, and we are preparing to use
d_revalidate in case-insensitive filesystems, which would make the
combination even more broken, reject any attempt to get a casefolded
inode from ecryptfs.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ecryptfs/inode.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
index 83274915ba6d..1305dc49df78 100644
--- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
@@ -78,6 +78,14 @@ static struct inode *__ecryptfs_get_inode(struct inode *lower_inode,
 
 	if (lower_inode->i_sb != ecryptfs_superblock_to_lower(sb))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EXDEV);
+
+	/* Reject dealing with casefold directories. */
+	if (S_ISDIR(lower_inode->i_mode) && dir_is_casefolded(lower_inode)) {
+		pr_err_ratelimited("%s: Can't handle casefolded directory.\n",
+				   __func__);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EREMOTE);
+	}
+
 	if (!igrab(lower_inode))
 		return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
 	inode = iget5_locked(sb, (unsigned long)lower_inode,
-- 
2.41.0




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux