on 2/14/2023 4:14 AM, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 08:27:32PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>>
>>
>> on 2/13/2023 3:03 PM, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 03:48:08AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>>>> We always get ext4_group_desc with group + 1 and ext4_group_info with
>>>> group to check if we need do initialize ext4_group_info for the group.
>>>> Just get ext4_group_desc with group for ext4_group_info initialization
>>>> check.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 6 +++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>>>> index 352ac9139fee..f24f80ecf318 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>>>> @@ -2570,13 +2570,13 @@ void ext4_mb_prefetch_fini(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
>>>> unsigned int nr)
>>>> {
>>>> while (nr-- > 0) {
>>>> - struct ext4_group_desc *gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, group,
>>>> - NULL);
>>>> - struct ext4_group_info *grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, group);
>>>> + struct ext4_group_desc *gdp;
>>>> + struct ext4_group_info *grp;
>>>>
>>>> if (!group)
>>>> group = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
>>>> group--;
>>>> + gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, group, NULL);
>>>> grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, group);
>>>>
>>>> if (EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_INIT(grp) &&
>>>> --
>>>> 2.30.0
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is a duplicate of [1] :)
>>>
>>> But I'm okay with this going in as that patchseries might take some time
>>> to get merged. Feel free to add:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/85bbcb3774e38de65b737ef0000241ddbdda73aa.1674822311.git.ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>> Hi Ojaswin, Thank you so much to review my code. I 'm sorry that I didn't
>> notice this patch is duplicated and I really appreciate that you allow this
>> one to get merged first. I will add your sign to this patch in next version.
>> Thanks!
> Hi Kemeng,
>
> So I'm not sure what the norm is when dealing with such duplicate
> patches, but if you do plan to add the Signed-off-by then I'd just like
> to point out that the patch I linked is mainly from Ritesh Harjani, so
> you can pick his Signed-off-by rather than mine.
>
Sorry that I miss that there are two Signed-off-bys in patch you have already
sent. I will collect both signs to this patch. Thanks!
--
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi
