On Thu 08-09-22 13:59:58, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 05:29:11PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> >
> > ** snip **
> > /*
> > * Choose next group by traversing average fragment size tree. Updates *new_cr
> Maybe we can change this to "average fragment size list of suitable
> order"
Right. Fixed. Thanks for catching this.
> > - * if cr lvel needs an update. Sets EXT4_MB_SEARCH_NEXT_LINEAR to indicate that
> > - * the linear search should continue for one iteration since there's lock
> > - * contention on the rb tree lock.
> > + * if cr level needs an update.
> > */
> > static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr1(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> > int *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups)
> > {
> > struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
> > - int avg_fragment_size, best_so_far;
> > - struct rb_node *node, *found;
> > - struct ext4_group_info *grp;
>
> Other than that, this patch along with the updated mb_structs_summary
> proc file change looks good to me.
Thanks for review & testing!
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
