On (22/08/09 21:57), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > This somehow makes me scratch my head and ask if we really want to > continue using per-CPU steams. We previously (many years ago) had > a list of idle compression streams, which would do compression in > preemptible context and we would have only one zs_malloc handle > allocation path, which would do direct reclaim (when needed) Scratch that, I take it back. Sorry for the noise.
