On 09. 08. 22, 14:35, Jiri Slaby wrote:
But the installer is different. It just creates memory pressure, yet, reclaim works well and is able to find memory and go on. I would say atomic vs non-atomic retry in the original (pre-5.19) approach makes the difference.
Sorry, I meant no-direct-reclaim (5.19) vs direct-reclaim (pre-5.19). -- js suse labs
