Re: [PATCHv2 00/10] ext4: Improve FC trace events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/03/11 09:45AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:42:49 +0530
> Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > You may add below, if you like:-
> >
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Will do. Thanks for testing.
>
> I'll be adding this for the next merge window. I don't think this is
> something that needs to be added to this rc release nor stable. Do you
> agree?

If using an enum in TP_STRUCT__entry's __array field doesn't cause any side
effect other than it just can't be decoded by userspace perf record / trace-cmd,
then I guess it should be ok.

But for this PATCH 2/10 "ext4: Fix ext4_fc_stats trace point", will be
needed to be Cc'd to stable tree as discussed before, as it tries to
dereference some sbi pointer from the tracing ring buffer. Then hopefully the
only problem with previous kernel version would be that ext4_fc_stats(), won't
show proper values for array entries in older kernel version where this patch
of trace_events is not found.
But cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe should be able to show the right values.



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux