On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 21:28:54 +0530 Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Note:- I still couldn't figure out how to expose EXT4_FC_REASON_MAX in patch-2 > which (I think) might be (only) needed by trace-cmd or perf record for trace_ext4_fc_stats. > But it seems "cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe" gives the right output > for ext4_fc_stats trace event (as shown below). > > So with above reasoning, do you think we should take these patches in? > And we can later see how to provide EXT4_FC_REASON_MAX definition available to > libtraceevent? I don't see EXT4_FC_REASON_MAX being used in the TP_printk(). If it isn't used there, it doesn't need to be exposed. Or did I miss something? -- Steve
