On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:57:36PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 05:43:10PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > @@ -825,6 +826,7 @@ struct ext2_super_block { > > #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM 0x0010 > > #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK 0x0020 > > #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE 0x0040 > > +#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_ORPHAN_PRESENT 0x0080 > > #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_QUOTA 0x0100 > > #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_BIGALLOC 0x0200 > > (This isn't a full review of the patch, but just a quick feedback of > what I've noticed so far.) > > Since Andreas has requested that we not get rid of the > RO_COMPAT_SNAPSHOT, I'm using 0x0400 for > EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_ORPHAN_PRESENT in my testing. Correction, this should have been 0x10000. - Ted