Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests, generic: add project quota attribute tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 09:47:28PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 7/6/16 6:35 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> >> +_require_scratch
> >> +_require_chattr
> >> +_require_test_lsattr
> >> +_require_quota
> > 
> > needs  _require_prjquota, and that function needs to be modified to
> > detect for both XFS and ext4 support.
> 
> I think that if there is desire to test both xfs and non-xfs userspace
> with project quota, then we need to differentiate between "e2fsprogs
> and linux-quota and the kernel all support it" and "xfsprogs and
> the kernel both support it" don't we?

Well, it should be just "linux-quota and kernel". ext4 needs to
have the same mount option behaviour for project quota as it does
for all other types of quota, not be dependent on mkfs....

> IOWs if the test uses setquota/repquota, chattr, mkfs, and fsck to
> work with project quota, then that's a different set of requirements
> from a test using xfs_io, xfs_quota, etc.

_require_linux_prjquota
_require_xfs_prjquota

But that said, both ext4 and xfs need to work for both
configurations, and they should all be using the common xfstests
quota infrastructure....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux