Re: BLKZEROOUT + pread should return zeroes, right?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:32:25PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Darrick" == Darrick J Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Darrick> Well then let's change BLKZEROOUT to require O_DIRECT instead
> Darrick> of hiding the coherency problem, 
> 
> That would break existing users, though.

<shrug> If they're using the existing BLKZEROOUT without O_DIRECT they're
already broken.

But I might as well just fix them quietly.

--D

> Darrick> A further optimization to mke2fs would be to detect that we've
> Darrick> run discard-with-zeroes and therefore can skip issuing
> Darrick> subsequent zeroouts on the same ranges, but I'm wary that
> Darrick> discard-zeroes-data does what it purports to do.
> 
> It's dubious. I'm working on making sure we only set discard_zeroes_data
> when the device guarantees it for 3.19.
> 
> -- 
> Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux