Re: Question: errors=continue behaviour for failed external journal device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:31:05AM -0400, Vlad Dobrotescu wrote:
> If you are talking about changes, wouldn't "read-only" be a better fall-back
> alternative for a failed or missing external journal?

For a missing external journal, we simply wouldn't allow the mount to
succeed at all.

The discussion here was about what to do if we detect some kind of
inconsistency in a mounted file system.

Cheers,

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux