On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:24:50 -0400 > From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> > To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix punch hole on files with indirect mapping > > I like the performance improvement of your patch, but I'm concerned > that it might be a bit too complicated to push outside of the merge > window. > > So what I propose doing is this. We'll take Jan's patches and after > testing, we'll push it to Linus. Then for the the 3.17 merge window, > after we've had more opportunity for testing and for other folks to > review your changes, we can queue this patch (or its successor). > > Does that seem like a good path forward? > > - Ted It does. But this is not exactly a critical bug and it has been there since the introduction of punch hole for indirect file. But I guess it's better to fix it sooner rather than later, so I am fine with this. Thanks! -Lukas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
