Re: [PATCH 0/6 v2] Introduce FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE flag for fallocate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, tytso@xxxxxxx wrote:

> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:00:30 -0400
> From: tytso@xxxxxxx
> To: =?utf-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBDemVybmVyIDxsY3plcm5lckByZWRoYXQuY29tPg==?=@thunk.org
> Cc: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v2] Introduce FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE flag for fallocate
> 
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 01:59:35PM +0100, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> > > The "dev2" branch in the ext4 git tree has all the patches in this
> > > series (1, 2, and 5) --- 3 was included earlier applied on top of the
> > > "dev" branch.  The "test" branch is the dev2 branch with the
> > > xfs-collapse-range branch pulled in, which actually enables the
> > > ZERO_RANGE flags (as well as the collapse range patches).
> > > 
> > > When I tried testing with the "test" branch, things failed pretty
> > > quickly.  I've attached two of these in this patch set.  I'm guessing
> > > it's some kind of memory corruption problem.  These failures are
> > > pretty repeatable, and it fails fast.
> 
> Can you let me know when you've had a chance to take a look at this
> failure?  Once we put back the EOFBLOCK_FL code, I suspect we should
> be fine with the first two patches in this patch series, but patch #5
> plus the xfs-collapse-range branch appears to still have issues.
> 
> Thanks!!
> 
> 						- Ted
> 

Ok, finally I got it. The problem is that we now have commit 

97d39798f77aef626130db8590cc79195300227b ext4: delete path dealloc
code in ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents

which I was not aware of before. And when merging you have used the
same out2 label out of the function. However when creating my new
function ext4_ext_convert_initialized_exten() so I've done the same
thing as with ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents() and freed the
path. And since we do not set path to NULL in ext4_ext_map_blocks
after calling ext4_ext_convert_initialized_extent() when we hit the
condition at the out2:

	if (path) {
		ext4_ext_drop_refs(path);
		kfree(path);
	}

we will double-free possibly destroying data from someone else. That
is why we've seen what looked like a random memory corruption.

I'll resend the patches including the EOFBLOCK_FL fixes.

Thanks!
-Lukas


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux