On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:29:18PM +0100, PaX Team wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> while running a simple analyzer plugin on linux 3.12.5 written by Emese Revfy
> we found a case in ext4 that looks like a potential problem. the code looks
> like this:
>
> 4082 map->m_pblk = (ee_start & ~(sbi->s_cluster_ratio - 1)) +
> 4083 c_offset;
>
> here the expression ~(sbi->s_cluster_ratio - 1) will first do the negation
> on an unsigned int then extend the result to unsigned long long (i.e, there's
> a 32->64 bit conversion on both 32 and 64 bit archs) and stores it as such.
> now this will obviously lose the higher 32 bits of ee_start and the question
> is: is this intended behaviour or a bug? later the code compares map->m_pblk
> against ee_block which is as unsigned int only so there's some mixture of
> integer types here that may warrant further review.
So C's integer promotion and sign extension rules are very obscure and
confusing, and that may be a reason why we should put in an explicit
cast, but it looks like the right thing is happening here. Here's a
test program --- what am I missing?
- Ted
#include <stdio.h>
typedef unsigned long long ext4_fsblk_t;
/* Mask out the the low */
#define EXT4_PHYS_CMASK(cr, pblk) (pblk & \
~((ext4_fsblk_t) cr - 1))
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
ext4_fsblk_t b, pblk;
unsigned short cr = 32;
pblk = 0x123456789ABC;
printf("%llx\n", pblk);
b = ~(cr - 1);
printf("%llx\n", b);
b = (pblk & ~(cr - 1));
printf("%llx\n", b);
b = EXT4_PHYS_CMASK(cr, pblk);
printf("%llx\n", b);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
