Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink should use cluster size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:40:42PM +0800, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
>> can be reproduced by xfstests 62 with  bigalloc and 128bit size inode.
>
> Hi Yongqiang,
>
> I can't find the original message you were replying.  I can
> reconstruct the 2/2 patch, but is there a 1/2 patch that you had meant
> to send to the linux-ext4 list?
Interesting, I sent the patch to ext4 list and you. I will resend them.

Thanks,
Yongqiang.
>
> Many thanks,
>
>                                         - Ted



-- 
Best Wishes
Yongqiang Yang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux