On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 10:38 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:14:29AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > > I don't think these did get cc'd to stable. Was there a reason for that, > > or was it an oversight? > > It was an oversight; my fault, sorry. I'll send a request to the > stable kernel tree for the following patches: > > 8af8eec ext4: fix overflow when counting used blocks on 32-bit architectures > a60697f ext4: fix data offset overflow in ext4_xattr_fiemap() on 32-bit archs Both queued up for 3.2, thanks. > e7293fd ext4: fix overflows in SEEK_HOLE, SEEK_DATA implementations > eaf3793 ext4: fix data offset overflow on 32-bit archs in ext4_inline_data_fiemap() These are for features that were added after 3.2. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
