On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:15:06AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:14:29AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> > >> I don't think these did get cc'd to stable. Was there a reason for that, > >> or was it an oversight? > > > > It was an oversight; my fault, sorry. I'll send a request to the > > stable kernel tree for the following patches: > > > > 8af8eec ext4: fix overflow when counting used blocks on 32-bit architectures > > a60697f ext4: fix data offset overflow in ext4_xattr_fiemap() on 32-bit archs > > e7293fd ext4: fix overflows in SEEK_HOLE, SEEK_DATA implementations > > eaf3793 ext4: fix data offset overflow on 32-bit archs in ext4_inline_data_fiemap() > > Greg, are these 4 commits part of the large pile you're sitting on > right now? Just want to make sure the request wasn't missed, as they > lack the CC to stable. They are still in my "to-apply" queue, and are not lost. And I wasn't counting them in the 170 patches I have to review, make that 174 now :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
