On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:25:48AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > Ah, sorry, I forgot to mention that this patch bases against ext4/master > branch. Now ext4/dev branch has some regression when I run xfstests. What regressions are you seeing? > Ted, I notice that now in ext4 tree we have 'dev', 'dev-with-revert', > and 'dev2' branches. Which one is the best to generate a new patch for > the next merge window? Either the dev branch or the master branch. The dev-with-revert and dev2 were branches that I had created when investigating a potential regression with the invalidage page range patch set. I've since determined that it's a timing issue and it's not a new regression --- we've had xfstests failures with test generic/300 for a while now. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
