On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 02:12:10PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 06/17/2013 03:10 AM, Zheng Liu wrote: > > Dave, that would be great if you could do your testing again to confirm > > this patch is useful. > > I was able to apply this to Ted's > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/ > > "ext4/dev" tree with a bit of fuzz. What did you generate this against, > btw? Ah, sorry, I forgot to mention that this patch bases against ext4/master branch. Now ext4/dev branch has some regression when I run xfstests. So I don't base against this branch to generate my patch. Ted, I notice that now in ext4 tree we have 'dev', 'dev-with-revert', and 'dev2' branches. Which one is the best to generate a new patch for the next merge window? > > It does seem to be functioning OK for me, and passes the other tests > that saw so much spinlock contention previously. You can add my > Tested-by if you like. Thanks for your testing. Regards, - Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
