Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ext4: fix wrong m_len value after unwritten extent conversion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oh, now I see my confusion.  You're talking about retval being
different from the output of map->m_len.  I was talking about retval
being often different from the *input* value of map->m_len.

I agree that the output of ext4_ext_map_blocks() and
ext4_ind_map_blocks() should be the same as map->m_len, and having a
BUG_ON there would make sense.  But we can save those changes for
after -rc3 as a cleanup....

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux