Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ext4: try to fix up es regressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:11:08PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I've placed these patches (with a few minor fixups) on the dev branch,
> and will start running a test/verification run on them).  Thanks for
> working on these patches!

Thanks.

As Dmitry's comment, I have updated my patches.

In patch 2 (ext4: add self-testing infrastructure to do a sanity check)
Dmitry suggests that we'd better replace 'retval != map->m_len' condition
with a BUG_ON().  But now I don't think we need to touch it because we
are still discussing this assumption.

In patch 4 (ext4: update extent status tree after an extent is zeroed
out) I have moved ext4_es_zeroout() into extents.c file and remove some
local variables that are only used once.  Do I need to send it out?  I
know the test has started.  Maybe I should wait a moment, and let the
tree stable before -rc2.

Regards,
                                                - Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux