Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test 255

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This patch has been committed.

Thanks
--Rich

commit 864688d368d6781c3f6d60bc55b5e3591953e462
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Mar 5 17:59:42 2013 +0000

    xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test 255

    As of Linux 3.9-rc1, ext4 will support the punch operation on file
    systems using indirect blocks, but it can not support the fallocate
    operation (since there is no way to mark a block as uninitialized
    using indirect block scheme).  This caused test 255 to fail, since it
    only used _require_xfS_io_falloc_punch assuming that all file systems
    which supported punch can also support fallocate.  Fix this.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux