Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test 255

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/05/2013 11:59 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
As of Linux 3.9-rc1, ext4 will support the punch operation on file
systems using indirect blocks, but it can not support the fallocate
operation (since there is no way to mark a block as uninitialized
using indirect block scheme).  This caused test 255 to fail, since it
only used _require_xfS_io_falloc_punch assuming that all file systems
which supported punch can also support fallocate.  Fix this.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
---
  255 | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/255 b/255
index 0083963..ae1d8e0 100755
--- a/255
+++ b/255
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ _supported_fs generic
  _supported_os Linux

  _require_xfs_io_falloc_punch
+_require_xfs_io_falloc
#rcj looks reasonable to me to add this requirement
  _require_xfs_io_fiemap

  testfile=$TEST_DIR/255.$$


Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux