Re: ext4 xfstests-bld results for 3.8-rc6 on Pandaboard ES

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:36:17AM +0800, gnehzuil.liu wrote:
> 
> Sorry, I haven't xfstests code in my hand, but I remember that #255
> is used to test hole punching feature.  So I suspect that no extents
> is the root cause because my patch set of indirect-based hole
> punching will cause it failed.

Ah, thanks for pointing that out.  I'll take a closer look tomorrow,
but I'm sure you're correct.

I hope you've been enojoying a good Chinese New Year's vacation;
thanks for checking in during your holiday.

Cheers,

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux