Re: ext4 xfstests-bld results for 3.8-rc6 on Pandaboard ES

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




发自我的 iPad

在 2013-2-11,上午11:24,Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> 写道:

> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:08:36PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> BEGIN TEST: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc, no flex_bg, and no extents Sun Feb 10 16:29:53 EST 2013
>> Failures: 255
> 
> Whoops, I spoke too soon.  This looks like a regression, which needs
> investigation...

Hi Ted,

Sorry, I haven't xfstests code in my hand, but I remember that #255 is used to test hole punching feature.  So I suspect that no extents is the root cause because my patch set of indirect-based hole punching will cause it failed.

Regards,
                                                - Zheng

> 
>                    - Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux