On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:30:56PM +0800, zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> +static int hot_range_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> + struct hot_range_item *hr = v;
> + struct hot_inode_item *he = hr->hot_inode;
> + struct hot_freq_data *freq_data = &hr->hot_range.hot_freq_data;
> +
> + /* Always lock hot_inode_item first */
> + spin_lock(&he->hot_inode.lock);
> + spin_lock(&hr->hot_range.lock);
> + seq_printf(seq, "inode #%llu, range start " \
the # seems unnecessary to me
> + "%llu (range len %u) reads %u, writes %u, "
> + "avg read time %llu, avg write time %llu, temp %u\n",
compiler will complain if it sees a %llu format and not the expected
type of 'unsigned long long'
> + he->i_ino,
(unsigned long long)he->i_ino,
> + (u64)hr->start * RANGE_SIZE,
> + hr->len,
> + freq_data->nr_reads,
> + freq_data->nr_writes,
> + freq_data->avg_delta_reads / NSEC_PER_MSEC,
> + freq_data->avg_delta_writes / NSEC_PER_MSEC,
> + freq_data->last_temp >> (32 - HEAT_MAP_BITS));
> + spin_unlock(&hr->hot_range.lock);
> + spin_unlock(&he->hot_inode.lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hot_inode_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> + struct hot_inode_item *he = v;
> + struct hot_freq_data *freq_data = &he->hot_inode.hot_freq_data;
> +
> + spin_lock(&he->hot_inode.lock);
> + seq_printf(seq, "inode #%llu, reads %u, writes %u, " \
> + "avg read time %llu, avg write time %llu, temp %u\n",
(same here)
> + he->i_ino,
> + freq_data->nr_reads,
> + freq_data->nr_writes,
> + freq_data->avg_delta_reads / NSEC_PER_MSEC,
> + freq_data->avg_delta_writes / NSEC_PER_MSEC,
> + freq_data->last_temp >> (32 - HEAT_MAP_BITS));
> + spin_unlock(&he->hot_inode.lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> +static void *hot_spot_range_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + struct hot_info *root = seq->private;
> + struct hot_range_item *hr_next, *hr = v;
> + struct hot_comm_item *comm_item;
> + struct list_head *n_list;
> + int i =
> + hr->hot_range.hot_freq_data.last_temp >> (32 - HEAT_MAP_BITS);
now I have noticed that I've seen the ... (32 - HEAT_MAP_BITS)
expression so many times that it tend to think it deserves a helper
function
> +
> + n_list = seq_list_next(&hr->hot_range.n_list,
> + &root->heat_range_map[i].node_list, pos);
> + hot_range_item_put(hr);
> +next:
> + if (n_list) {
> + comm_item = container_of(n_list,
> + struct hot_comm_item, n_list);
> + hr_next = container_of(comm_item,
> + struct hot_range_item, hot_range);
> + kref_get(&hr_next->hot_range.refs);
> + return hr_next;
> + } else if (--i >= 0) {
> + n_list = seq_list_next(&root->heat_range_map[i].node_list,
> + &root->heat_range_map[i].node_list, pos);
> + goto next;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void hot_debugfs_exit(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> + struct dentry *vol_dentry;
> +
> + vol_dentry = debugfs_get_dentry(sb->s_id,
> + sb->s_hot_root->debugfs_root, strlen(sb->s_id));
> + /* remove all debugfs entries recursively from the volume root */
> + if (vol_dentry)
> + debugfs_remove_recursive(vol_dentry);
> + else
> + BUG_ON(1);
BUG()
> +
> + if (list_empty(&sb->s_hot_root->debugfs_root->d_subdirs))
> + debugfs_remove(sb->s_hot_root->debugfs_root);
> +}
> +
> +/*
david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
