On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 04:14:49PM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > Not a bad idea really. > > I've found some functions properly handling the problem (i.e !bh and !err), but > some of them not. I'm thinking in fix functions with missing hole handlers and > after that think about a 'default directory hole handler' for this, instead of > make each function work on a specific way. I'd have to take a look at a patch, but I didn't think there would be enough code to be worth factoring out into a separate function. It's just a conditional, a call to ext4_error(), and then setting up the return code and releasing resources that need to be released on our way out (which tends to be function-specific). Am I missing something? - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
