Re: Ongoing data reorganization/defragmentation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12.09.2012 20:15, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, norritt@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

 From what I've found out it's a good idea to:
- mount with noatime, discard (if drive supports trim)
The -o discard option might be tricky since some devices still
handles it quite badly and you can experience big performance drops
(http://people.redhat.com/lczerner/discard/ although it is somewhat
outdated already). But you might to try to see yourself if it does
not hurt your performance.

The other option would be to use batched discard with fstrim (see
fstrim from util-linux) and run it once per (day, week, month).

Thanks!
-Lukas


Hi  Lukáš,
thank you for pointing out the performance issue with the discard mount option, I hadn't read about that yet. As far is I know I'm using a quite special SSD (SanDisk, with a SanDisk controller), where most other SSDs on the market seem to be based on Marvell, Sandforce or Indilinx controllers. I saw that you were using SSDs from various vendors for your benchmarking tests. Was a model with SanDisk controller among the drives you tested? Would postmark data about disks with SanDisk controller be of interest to you?

Regards Nor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux