Re: [PATCH 3/5] e2fsck: print a notice when we've started suppressing a problem code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-03-18, at 6:25 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 05:17:20PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> 
>> Did a patch ever land to allow an interactive e2fsck run to set
>> a sticky answer (y/n) for a particular problem?  I know it has
>> been proposed several times.
> 
> It's been proposed but I don't think anyone has ever coded it.

There was the patch at: http://marc.info/?t=118597336000002&r=1&w=2
but I think the objection was that the "yes-to-all" and "no-to-all"
answers "A" and "O" were confusing for non-english speakers ("Oui",
for example).

However, I agree with the approach, and forcing a longer answer for
such a case like "yes-to-all" or "no-to-all" (or foreign equivalents)
is probably OK.

Cheers, Andreas





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux