On 2012-03-18, at 1:52 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> e2fsck/problem.c | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.c b/e2fsck/problem.c
> index 53e8e11..7d5b10d 100644
> --- a/e2fsck/problem.c
> +++ b/e2fsck/problem.c
> @@ -1868,6 +1868,11 @@ int fix_problem(e2fsck_t ctx, problem_t code, struct problem_context *pctx)
> if ((ptr->flags & PR_LATCH_MASK) &&
> (ldesc->flags & (PRL_YES | PRL_NO)))
> suppress++;
> + if (ptr->count == ptr->max_count + 1) {
> + printf("...problem 0x%06x suppressed\n",
> + ptr->e2p_code);
> + fflush(stdout);
> + }
Did a patch ever land to allow an interactive e2fsck run to set
a sticky answer (y/n) for a particular problem? I know it has
been proposed several times.
Cheers, Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
