Re: e2fsck and backup superblocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 18, 2012, at 4:31 PM, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:05:36PM -0800, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 2/17/12 7:00 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
>>> I have noticed that e2fsck always complains about block group descriptor checksums being invalid when run on a backup superblock, even when run again immediately after being told to fix them.  Is there some odd intentional behavior here I'm not aware of?
>> 
>> Check the list for:
>> 
>> "[PATCH] libext2fs: quiet spurious group checksum errors"
> 
> Which is in e2fsprogs 1.42.1....
> 
Was that the release announcement?  :)

- Eric

>                                                  - Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux