Re: e2fsck and backup superblocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2/17/12 7:00 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> I have noticed that e2fsck always complains about block group descriptor checksums being invalid when run on a backup superblock, even when run again immediately after being told to fix them.  Is there some odd intentional behavior here I'm not aware of?

Check the list for:

"[PATCH] libext2fs: quiet spurious group checksum errors"

- -Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPPxV/AAoJECCuFpLhPd7gul4P/3OOyVnLqAapkkApwJf1cRq0
SDNH/1d8cbldwLMizgAuE3omoJRbzgpy6jghOtq573e1IOIskbQFDxG8HBSg6GGn
E1Yw8UcaCqKERRiemTESmC6Idtj6EAusZJWeTlC9XRx0Cbx8bGJenlU6eR/vpxH0
AvOPmgJhNMcRyMdsHLsvXXZNER5j9St1AEEVa2Wzpo2PGyJjVP8jDnJiuhvz2bK3
nv5u28WSuF5y8zzTs0j6DT40XQlpT/OVNflqUGelhxKHBB+sT2c0VvaVhVy63hw/
yuaIMmnwggJSs6p//9iOtKJhTSmR6qSGuuT65ajMgixy66efRLI0C0e5Y/U4stS4
cpT8m8+FGILhIe+Q+sJ2nOxC1JUvZW3AQvi0/gLZDCpzBid9RrmigfU/FTxs4MQB
CD9QDkmhz7A7rUvRulC4NSSXcgErMtwC5zAXG9MKiFAtvMBqYXWhWoKfxslaZXOU
5sOIvoB+TOwlWL2StQgwnJjJMCZ9/Eju2VhgEFbZxEgpInaFpk/FUm2k4hzQpHY9
M1ItllWFrR/XMXxozmN1/KmynOLdBEf4rW/BouC+ZCGZLeUOg8M+obJFNICFQEXq
VLSvUfIfsLaLb2ApBUyq75/mvIQIo5mCjRYqi1Ev7Rx8XrFWHfNR62Q/VwAVU6X+
vqDKt1dPO06sBPpzOdiP
=jdg1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux