On 2011-11-19, at 20:14, Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Andreas Dilger <aedilger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2011-11-19, at 2:57, Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Below are benchmarks I made on my personal computer, fses with >>> flex_bg size = 16 were resized to 230GB evry time. The first >>> row shows the size of a fs from which the fs was resized to 230GB. >>> The datas were collected by 'time resize2fs'. >>> >>> new resize >>> 20GB 50GB 100GB >>> real 0m3.558s 0m2.891s 0m0.394s >>> user 0m0.004s 0m0.000s 0m0.394s >>> sys 0m0.048s 0m0.048s 0m0.028s >>> >>> current resize >>> 20GB 50GB 100GB >>> real 5m2.770s 4m43.757s 3m14.840s >>> user 0m0.040s 0m0.032s 0m0.024s >>> sys 0m0.464s 0m0.432s 0m0.324s >> >> These stats must be backward, because resizing 20GB takes more time than resizing 100GB. > > Every time, the filesystem was resized from 20/50/100GB to 230GB, so > resizing 20GB should takes more time than resizing 100GB. I am not > sure what you meant. Sorry, I didn't read closely enough. I thought it was resizing by the given amount. Cheers, Andreas-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
