RE: [PATCH] ext3/xattr_seciruty.c: local functions should be static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 4:38 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 23-09-11 15:07:09, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> Quiets the sparse noise:
>> 
>> warning: symbol 'ext3_initxattrs' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
>  Here applies the same comment as to the ext2 patch - not in current
> Linus' kernel AFAICS.

These are in linux-next due to:

commit 9d8f13ba3f4833219e50767b022b82cd0da930eb
Author: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Mon Jun 6 15:29:25 2011 -0400

    security: new security_inode_init_security API adds function callback

I can repost these after this commit hits Linus' kernel if necessary.

Thanks,
Hartley--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux