On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 03:49:22PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > testing fs for NULL in expand_percent_expression(): > > e2fsck_ctx = fs ? (e2fsck_t) fs->priv_data : NULL; > > implies that fs could be NULL, but it's passed to print_pathname() > which defererences it without further testing. > > So make this safe by returning "???" for a nul fs. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied, thanks. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
