testing fs for NULL in expand_percent_expression(): e2fsck_ctx = fs ? (e2fsck_t) fs->priv_data : NULL; implies that fs could be NULL, but it's passed to print_pathname() which defererences it without further testing. So make this safe by returning "???" for a nul fs. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- e2fsck/message.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/e2fsck/message.c b/e2fsck/message.c index 565c3cd..f178321 100644 --- a/e2fsck/message.c +++ b/e2fsck/message.c @@ -203,8 +203,9 @@ static void print_pathname(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t dir, ext2_ino_t ino) return; } - retval = ext2fs_get_pathname(fs, dir, ino, &path); - if (retval) + if (fs) + retval = ext2fs_get_pathname(fs, dir, ino, &path); + if (!fs || retval) fputs("???", stdout); else { safe_print(path, -1); -- 1.7.4.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html