On 08/20/2011 08:23 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On 2011-08-19, at 4:29 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:54:14PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
+static inline int is_32bit_api(void)
+{
+#ifdef HAVE_IS_COMPAT_TASK
+ return is_compat_task();
+#else
+ return (BITS_PER_LONG == 32);
+#endif
I assume is_compat_task() is coming from another patch? What is the
status of that change?
No, is_compat_task() is upstream for most (all?) of the architectures
that support hybrid 32-/64-bit operation. It is set at 32-bit syscall
entry when running on 64-bit architectures.
The only minor error in this patch (fixed with a new version from Bernd)
is that this should be under CONFIG_COMPAT instead of HAVE_IS_COMPAT_TASK.
Yes sorry again about this. Could you please see patch series v4 please?
In the case where is_compat_task() is not defined, we can't just test
based on BITS_PER_LONG == 32, since even on an x86_64 machine, it's
possible we're running a 32-bit binary in compat mode....
It is definitely available on x86_64.
Yep, otherwise it even wouldn't compile, at least not with patch series v4.
Thanks,
Bernd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
