Re: [PATCH 0/2] 32/64 bit llseek hashes (v3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/23/2011 11:56 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:54:04PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
With the ext3/ext4 directory index implementation hashes are used to specify
offsets for llseek(). For compatibility with NFSv2 and 32-bit user space
on 64-bit systems (kernel space) ext3/ext4 currently only return 32-bit
hashes and therefore the probability of hash collisions for larger directories
is rather high. As recently reported on the NFS mailing list that theoretical
problem also happens on real systems:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/40863

The following series adds two new f_mode flags to tell ext4
to use 32-bit or 64-bit hash values for llseek() calls.
These flags can then used by network file systems, such as NFS, to
request 32-bit or 64-bit offsets (hashes).

Version 3:
- remove patch "RFC: Remove check for a 32-bit cookie in nfsd4_readdir()",
   I think Bruce wanted to take it seperately as bug fix. It should be applied
   before applying the remaining NFS patches, as without it NFSv4 will always
   fail with the new 64-bit ext4 seek hashes.

Yes, applied to my for-3.2 branch at
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git.

For the NFS patches:

	Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields<bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>

OK by me if they go in through ext4 tree, or however's most convenient.

Great, thanks!


Cheers,
Bernd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux