On Mon, 23 May 2011, Jan Kara wrote:
> > @@ -1577,6 +1589,7 @@ static int ext3_ordered_writepage(struct page *page,
> > if (ext3_journal_current_handle())
> > goto out_fail;
> >
> > + trace_ext3_ordered_writepage(inode, page);
> > if (!page_has_buffers(page)) {
> > create_empty_buffers(page, inode->i_sb->s_blocksize,
> > (1 << BH_Dirty)|(1 << BH_Uptodate));
> Any reason why writepage() takes inode while all other page operations
> take only the page pointer? I see ext4 does this as well but still we don't
> have to be *that* compatible :). Otherwise the patch looks OK.
>
> Honza
Oh, I did not notice that. Thanks, I'll create just one EVENT_CLASS for
page operations.
Thanks!
-Lukas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
