On May 16, 2011, at 19:35, Keith Mannthey wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:49 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >> Per the discusison on the ext4 concall, here's a proposed ext4 test >> matrix. >> >> - Ted >> >> P.S. There was something else I said I would send out, but I didn't >> write it down and I can't remember what it was. Can someone remind me? >> Thanks!! >> >> >> 4k blocksize, no journal, nodealloc, noextents (-t ext2) >> 1k blocksize, no journal, nodealloc, noextents (-t ext2) >> 4k blocksize, journal, nodealloc, noextents (-t ext3) >> 1k blocksize, journal, nodealloc, noextents (-t ext3) >> 4k blocksize, journal, delalloc, extents (-t ext4) >> 1k blocksize, journal, delalloc, extents (-t ext4) >> 4k blocksize, nojournal, delalloc, extents >> 4k blocksize, journal, 64bits(*), delalloc, extents (-t ext4) >> 1k blocksize, journal, 64bits(*), delalloc, extents (-t ext4) >> 4k blocksize, nojournal, 64bits(*), delalloc, extents >> 4k blocksize, journal, delalloc, extents, quota enabled (-t ext4) >> 1k blocksize, journal, delalloc, extents, quota enabled (-t ext4) > > What tests are we wanting to run? On the call Ted said it would be desirable to run xfstests for all of these configurations. Since xfstests already runs quite a number of smaller tests like fsx, etc, this would definitely be a very good smoke test for the most common configurations. I added "-t" to the ext2/ext3/ext4 configs above, since without those options the features enabled for the various filesystems will not be the same as they are formatted by default. For example, with the default "-t ext4" a number of other features like "flex_bg", "uninit_bg", "huge_file", "dir_nlink" and "extra_isize" are enabled, but they shouldn't be enabled for ext2/ext3. Cheers, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
